In the busy lives of the average young person living in 2016, efficiency is key.
"There are plenty of fish in the sea."The age-old saying traditionally applies to dating, but it can also apply to dating apps.
With so many dating sites and apps available today, where does one even start?
Half of the participants were asked to choose one potential partner from a small group and the other half selected from a larger pool.
All profiles that the students viewed had been pre-vetted and rated equally attractive by an outside group.
Tinder puts your pics front and center, and gives you a small space for writing an elevator pitch about yourself.
If you're uncomfortable being primarily judged by your photos, you're better off with a more traditional site like the ones listed above, where you can impress your future suitor with more details in a meatier written profile.If you ever get overwhelmed, or eventually find The One, most let you deactivate or delete your profile.These dating apps are the equivalent to a pair of khakis from The Gap; there's absolutely nothing wrong with them, they're just overwhelmingly bland compared to what else is out there.In applying this framework to online dating, we pushed its boundaries from choices among objects to choices among people, and from low-stake to high-stake choices.The predicted effects emerged in online dating, underscoring the robustness of the choice overload framework across a variety of different types of choices.What happens to relationships when finding a date is as easy as requesting a ride or ordering take-out?